I have started reading “A Random Walk Down Wall Street” over this July 4 long weekend after reading about it on Joel On Software book reviews. Very enjoyable read. My personal experience has been with the dot-gone bubble of late 90s and may be the present bubble or froth as quoted by Alan Greenspan in the real estate markets. Some of the excerpts from the chapter “Madness of Crowds” are so relevant that I am surprised we never seem to learn from old mistakes.
Consider this when Burton G. Malkiel talks about the tulip craze and the call-options which happened in Holland in 1630s
“Part of the genius of financial markets is that when there is a real demand for a method to enhance speculative opportunities, the market will surely provide it”
Isn’t what markets did when every mom-and-pop dot.com company went IPO in the 90s or the interest only loans and adjustable ARMs of today.
I am equally amazed at reading the story British South Sea Company and the South Sea Bubble. Can’t imagine its share between 1717-1722 went from 100 pounds to 1000 pounds and then back to nothing. Or how about the RCA shares back in America rose from $94.25 to $505 from March 3, 1928 to September 3, 1929; a cool 434.5% growth in 18 months. I think this beats the growth of modern day darling Google. That too when we are in correction mode after the 90s.
This last paragraph of the chapter is what is most intriguing to me. I have read something to the same effect in quite a few articles. But it still beats me how this can be so simple. The business of making more money from existing money or investing
It is not hard, really, to make money in the market. As we shall see later, investors who select a portfolio of stock listings in the Wall Street Journal can make fairly handsome long-run returns. What is hard to avoid is the alluring temptation to throw your money away on short, get-rich-quick speculative binges.
Notice the “really”. Do you think so.
4 Responses
Nilesh Chandra
July 4th, 2005 at 10:12 am
1Theoretically, over s sufficiently long term - yes this is true. Most fund managers cannot beat the S&P 500, which basically means that buying random stocks should provide as good returns as buying the “darlings”.
Stocks have better return than any other investment, but they also have the highest risk.
Ultimately, what this guy is trying to say is true - no matter how much you try to make a science out of it, picking stocks and generating wealth is usually pretty simple.
admin
July 4th, 2005 at 12:46 pm
2If it is that simple why we swaggering imbeciles fail at it.
Nilesh Chandra
July 4th, 2005 at 9:00 pm
3Patience! Patience! We lack patience.
When we have patience, we do not have a diverse enough portfolio.
Invest in a S&P-indexed mutual fund and over 20 years, you’ll hardly find ANY stock-based fund manager who can give you better returns.
Bhulabai
September 21st, 2005 at 1:42 pm
4Ilike excepts of madness of cow, but what about chapter 1, 3, 4 and 9, &10 on Random Walk Down Wall street
If some body else can provide me I will highly appreciate
B.N. Desai
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
Categories
Blogs I Read
Hindi Blogs
Welcome
Now Reading
Planned books:
Current books:
Micromotives and Macrobehavior by Thomas C. Schelling
The Business of Software: What Every Manager, Programmer, and Entrepreneur Must Know to Thrive and S by Michael A. Cusumano
Recent books:
View full Library
Recent Comments
Meta
Cartoon
Beta Thoughts | Pankaj Narula is proudly powered by WordPress - BloggingPro theme by: Design Disease